Face-banded Sesarmine Crab
Perisesarma eumolpe
Last updated by Wong Jinfa on 25 November 2012.

Table of Contents

Name
Introduction
Distribution
Diagnosis
Tubercles
Third Maxillipeds
Anatomy
Description
Carapace
Facial Bands
Third Maxillipeds
Pterygostomial Region
Chelipeds (Pincers)
Walking legs
Biology
Facial Bands
Facial Bands & Carotenoids
Feeding Ecology
Stridulation
Branchial Water Movement & Reticulated Setae
Reproduction
Taxonomy
Taxonavigation
Taxonomic History
Phylogenetics
Comments
Links
Literature Cited

P eumolpe front.png

Fig. 1. Front view of Perisesarma eumolpe. (Photo: Jinfa & Christopher©) >>>

Vid. 01. Photograph slideshow of P. eumolpe. (Photos: Jinfa, Maosheng & Christopher©)


Name

  • Binomial: Perisesarma eumolpe (De Man, 1895) [1]
>
  • Synonoms: Sesarma (Perisesarma) eumolpe De Man, 1895 [2]
    Synonoms: Sesarma (Chiromantes) eumolpe De Man, 1895 [3]
>
  • Vernacular: Face-banded Seasarmine Crab
    [This is a general name used to refer to all Perisesarma sp.]

Perisesarma eumolpe 02.jpg
Fig. 2. Dorsal view of P. eumolpe.
(Photo: Jinfa©)


Introduction


Perisesarma eumolpe is a common crab that is found in the mangroves of the Indo-pacific region. [4] It has colourful facial bands that are usually iridescent blue, yellow, green or turquoise. [5] Unlike most other animals that can only see in black and white, these crabs can see in colour! [6] This allows them to recognize and communicate to one another with their facial bands. For example, bigger crabs often have blue bands which indicate that they are mature and "fitter", so weaker individuals would know not to mess with that individual. [7]

Colour is also good indication of fitness as the crabs have to obtain enough carotenoids in their diet to produce it. [8] This comes from eating leaves. [9] While foraging, crabs also disturb the muddy substrate and help aerate the anaerobic soil of the mangrove, such that mangrove plants can grow better. [10] Thus, the crabs are very important in the mangroves and can be easily spotted at Sungei Buloh Nature Reserve (Singapore) at low tide. Can you spot the crab in Fig. 3? Click on it after you find it.


Fig. 3. P. eumople in Mandai mangroves. (Animation: Jinfa©)

Did you notice the water on the face of the crab in Fig. 3? The crabs are able to stay out of water for long periods because of the net-like hairs on their face that trap water. Deoxygenated water that has passed through the gills can be directed to these hairs where they are aerated with oxygen before it is moved back. [11]

The crabs also communicate to one another by rubbing the bumps on their claws together to produce sound and listen to one another with their legs! [12]

When a male crab finds a potential mate, it often has to guard the female from other males before copulation. After successfully mating, the male would leave the female to take care of the fertilised eggs that are held in her abdomen until a full or new moon. During the high tide of such a night, the female will spawn the eggs that will hatch into planktonic larvae. [13]

For more detailed explanation on these interesting facts, refer to the Biology section,


Distribution


P. eumolpe is found in the Indo-pacific region [4]. Fig. 5 has the locations of where crabs were found or collected in some publications, in addition to locations indicated on Flickr. I have also included the locations and photographs of some crabs that I have found personally. The locations demarcated with an asterisk are from very old records, that might have changed such that they are no longer habitats for P. eumolpe.
Indo-Pacific [4]:
Perisesarma eumolpe habitat.png
Fig. 4. P. eumolpe hiding under roots (Photo: Jinfa©)

View Perisesarma Eumolpe Distribution in a larger map
Fig. 5. Distribution of P. eumolpe



Diagnosis


There are 23 species of face-banded crabs (Perisesarma sp.) found in the world and six that are recorded in Singapore. [20][21] Two common, similar looking face-banded crabs that can be found living side by side are Perisesarma eumolpe and Perisesarma indiarum (Fig. 6) [5] .

Fig. 6. Photographs of P. eumolpe (left) and P. indiarium (right) (Animation: Jinfa© with photographs by Dr. Naruse, Jinfa and Christopher©)

It is often difficult to tell them apart in the wild. This is because when they are covered in mud, one can only see their red chelae (pincers) and iridescent blue, yellow or green facial bands (personal observation). There are ways though to tell the two crabs apart:

Tubercles

  • Tubercles are small rounded projections found on the upper surface of the dactyl (terminal segment of the pincer) (Fig. 7).
  • P. eumolpe has tubercles which are smaller and more numerous compared to P. indiarum (Fig. 7 & 8). [12]
  • This method requires the use of close inspection of the chelae and thus can be difficult to use on a living crab!
.
Perisesarma eumolpe & indiarum claw.png
Fig. 7. Tubercles on the dactyl of P. eumolpe (left) and P. indiarum (right). (Photo: Jinfa & Dr. Naruse©)
>
.
Perisesarma eumolpe tubercles.png
Fig. 8. Tubercle illustrations on the dactyl (Illustration reproduced with permission from Boon et al, 2009)

To learn more on how P. eumolpe produces sound with its chelae, refer to the Biology (Stridulation) section.

Third Maxillipeds

  • The third maxillipeds make up the upside down V on the crab's face
  • The third maxillipeds for P. eumolpe is black in colour compared to the blue, yellow or green coloured maxilliped for P. indiarum (Fig. 9). [18]
  • However, this might not an accurate tool for identification as colouration is affected by diet. Thus, If a crab does not obtain enough food (carotenoids), the colours might not be reflected. [7]
.
p eumolpe black.jpgp indiarium yellow.jpg
Fig. 9. Comparison of the 3rd maxilliped of P. eumolpe (left) and P. indiarium (right) (Photo: Peiya©)

To learn more on how to identify P. eumolpe, refer to the Anatomy and Description section.


Anatomy

The annotations (Fig. 10 & 11) were made with reference to Ng, 1988 [22] and help of Dr. Ng Ngan Kee.
Perisesarma eumolpe anatomy 1b.png
Fig. 10. Dorsal (top) view of P. eumolpe with annotations. (Photo: Jinfa©)

Perisesarma eumolpe anatomy 2.png
Fig. 11. Front view of P. eumolpe with annotations. (Photo: Jinfa©)

Male and female crabs can be identified by the differences in the shape of the abdomen on the ventral side (underside) of the crab.
Females have a circular abdomen (Fig. 12) while males have a triangular abdomen (Fig. 13).
>
P eumolpe female abdomen.png>> P eumolpe male abdomen.png
Fig. 12. Ventral (bottom) view of a P. eumolpe female (Photo: Jinfa & Christopher©)>>>>Fig. 13. Ventral (bottom) view of a P. eumolpe male (Photo: Jinfa & Christopher©)

The female's opening where sperm is injected into is called the vulva (Fig 14). Females have two vulvae.
Upon fertilization, the eggs are held by the female in her abdominal cavity before she spawns (Fig. 15).
>
Perisesarma eumolpe 16.pngPerisesarma eumolpe 17.png
Fig. 14. Location of vulva in a female (Photo: Jinfa & Maosheng©) >>>>Fig. 15. Eggs held in the abdominal segments of a female P. eumolpe (Photo: Jinfa & Maosheng©)

The male's reproductive organs used to insert into the female's two vulvae are called gonopods (Fig. 16)
>
Perisesarma eumolpe 18.png
Fig. 16. Male P. eumolpe have a pair of gonopods (Photo: Jinfa©)
For more information on how the crabs reproduce, refer to the Biology (Reproduction) section


Description


The crab was named and first described by De Man (Fig. 17). [2] For more information on its taxonomy, please refer to the Taxonomy section.
p eumolpe Description.jpg
Fig. 17. Screenshot of De Man's description (Image: BioStor)

Readers, please be advised that colour is not a good technique to identify a species as:
  • It can be subjective (different people can view the same colour differently) [23]
  • It is usually lost with time in preserved specimens (as seen in Fig. 17). [24]

However, colour has been included in the subsequent descriptions as they are more practical to be applied in the field before more robust checks can be applied. If you come across any unfamiliar terms, please refer to the Anatomy section for reference.
Perisesarma eumolpe 03.png
Fig. 18. Front view of preserved P. eumolpe. (Photo: Jinfa©)



Carapace

  • Squarish shape [22]
    (Anterolateral and posterolateral margins of carapace not clearly demarcated)
  • Black colour with small yellow patches
  • Two anterolateral tooth on the carapace
    (Presence of anterolateral tooth is a
    distinguishing feature of Perisesarma
    according to De Man
    [2]. However, more recent
    studies have shown that this characteristic is not
    very consistent or well defined for some Perisesarma sp. [25][26][27])
p eumolpe carapace.png
Fig. 19a. Carapace location on P. eumolpe (Illustration: Jinfa©)

Perisesarma eumolpe 08.png
Fig. 19b. Squarish carapace of P. eumolpe. (Photo: Jinfa©)



Facial Bands

  • Found at the frontal region, epistome,
    endostome and subobital region
  • The colours of the facial bands are usually
    iridescent blue, yellow, green or turquoise. [5]
p eumolpe face.png
Fig. 20a. Facial band location on P. eumolpe (Illustration: Jinfa©)

Perisesarma eumolpe 04.pngPerisesarma eumolpe 05.png
Fig. 20b. P. eumolpe with different coloured facial bands.(Photos: Jinfa & Maosheng©)



Third Maxillipeds

  • Is black in colour [5]
  • Rhomboidal gap present between third
    maxillipeds with
    mandibles exposed
    (Distinguishing feature of Sesarmidae & Grapsidae)
    [22]
  • Merus and ischium of third maxillipeds with ridge (Distinguishing feature of Sesarmidae) [22]
p eumolpe V.png
Fig. 21a. Third maxilliped locations on P. eumolpe (Illustration: Jinfa©)

Perisesarma eumolpe 12.png Perisesarma eumolpe 13.png

Fig. 21b. Third maxillipeds of P. eumolpe tucked in (top left), stretched out (top right) & moving (bottom).
(Photos & Animation: Jinfa©)



Pterygostomial Region

  • Short and stiff setae (hairs) form reticulated
    (net-like) pattern at the pterygostomial region.
    (Distinguishing feature of Sesarmidae)
    [22]
p eumolpe net.png
Fig. 22a. Pterygostomial region on P. eumolpe (Illustration: Jinfa)

Perisesarma eumolpe 07.png
Fig. 22b. Pterygostomial region of P. eumolpe has retiuclated setae. (Photos: Jinfa©)



Chelipeds (Pincers)

  • Red chelae
  • P. eumolpe has many small tubercles (bumps)
    on the upper surface of the dactyl [12]
  • The left and right pincers can be
    sometimes unequal in size
    [3]
p eumolpe chelae.png
Fig. 23a. Cheliped locations of P. eumolpe (Illustration: Jinfa©)

Perisesarma eumolpe 19.jpgPerisesarma eumolpe 24.png
Fig. 23b. Red chelipeds of P. eumolpe. (Photo: Jinfa & Christopher©)



Walking legs

  • Dactylus of legs with distinct spines [22]
p eumolpe leg.png
Fig. 24a. Walking leg locations of P. eumolpe (Illustration: Jinfa©)

Perisesarma eumolpe 11.png
Fig. 24b. Dactylus of P. eumolpe. (Photo: Jinfa©)
>
To find out how to tell the difference between P. eumolpe & another similar looking crab, P. indiarum, refer to the Diagnosis section


Biology


Facial Bands


The facial bands of Perisesarma eumolpe are used to communicate their gender, maturity level, nutritional status and other qualities with one another.

Firstly, the facial bands could be used by the crabs to recognize each other as conspecifics (members of the same species). When the facial bands of some of the crabs were blackened out in a study, other crabs seemed to ignore them. This could be because they were unable to recognize each other. [6][8] But, can these crabs really see colour? This was tested by Huang with heat associated learning. Crabs were observed to go in the direction of a Y-junction that had a different colour from the starting chamber that was heated up which suggested that they are able to see colour. [6]


Majority of male crabs also have a blue band while majority of the females have green bands. This are used by crabs to discriminate gender. [5][6][7] Females were also found to have a positive correlation between the intensity of blue and their size, functioning as indicators of their maturity level. [5][6] The contrasting blue bands could also function in conspecific signalling during contestation for territory and matings rights. [5][6] Males were observed to display mate-guarding behaviours, choosing to move towards the male in a Y-chamber displaying male and female andromorphs.[7] This indicates that males gain more by fighting off other male competitors than by trying to attract females. Furthermore, when the facial bands of a male crab was blackened out, another male displayed less aggressiveness to it. These suggest the facial bands were important for male-male assessment. [5][6] Females similarly approached the female andromorph in the Y-chamber. This might be because they stand to gain more by keeping other females away from their territory compared to finding a mate, especially if it is resource-rich and are home to males. [7] In addition, both sexes choose to approach more brightly coloured conspecifics. [16] These evidence suggest that facial bands are honest signals and are used for assessing an individual's resource holding potential. [7]8][16] Resource holding potential is the capability of an animal to win if it engages in a fight. If a crab is not fit, it would not be able to expend resources to produce costly colours. Thus, dull coloured crabs can mean the crab is less fit and so do not pose a threat. This would help the crabs to avoid unnecessary fighting and injuries and thus save their energy for other activities such as foraging or burrowing. [28]

Perisesarma eumolpe 20 yellow.jpg >>>>>>>Perisesarma eumolpe 21.JPG
Fig. 25. P. eumople with green facial band. (Photo: Jinfa©)>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Fig. 26. P. eumople with blue facial band. (Photo: Jinfa©)

Facial Bands & Carotenoids


The colours in the facial bands are most likely a result of their carotenoid-based diets. Differing from other mangrove sesarmids that rely heavily on mangrove sediments for assimilating carbon, Perisesarma crabs also feed on mangrove leaves, which contain carotenoids.[7][9][17] Wang tested if diet would affect facial colours by starving and then re-feeding some crabs. The results were a reduction in facial band brightness and colour saturation during starvation which increased again upon re-feeding.[7][8] This suggest that the colours could be cartenoid-based as carotenoids cannot be synthesised de novo and have to be obtained from their diet. [7][8] Further support was found from high performance liquid chromatography analysis of extracted facial band tissues that confirmed the presence of carotenoids.[7]17]


Vid. 02. Facial band of P. eumolpe fading over time. (Animation: Jinfa©)

For making this species page, I have also caught some crabs which I kept for about a month. In my glass tank, i had mangrove mud and leaves to ensure the crabs had enough food. However, I did observe that the one or two of the crabs with the yellow and green bands lost their colour completely within 2 weeks while crabs with the blue bands only became duller (personal observation).
p. eumolpe with band.pngp. eumolpe faded band.jpg
Fig. 28a. P. eumolpe with healthy facial bands. (Photo: Jinfa©)>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Fig. 28b. P. eumolpe with faded facial bands. (Photo: Jinfa©)

Feeding Ecology


Perisesarma comprises one of the highest biomass of crabs in the mangrove, performing many ecological roles in the mangrove. [29] As Perisesarma feed on mangrove leaves, some of the energy stored in the leaves stay in the mangrove system, before they are lost when the tides wash them away. [10] Leaves that are broken into tiny pieces that not eaten and their faeces also enters the coprophagous food chain, providing food for other tiny organisms. [29] During foraging and burrowing, the crabs also perform bioturbation (stirring and mixing of the sediments), which can affect the growth of and reproduction of mangrove plants. [10][19] P. eumolpe are primarily sediment feeders that also feed on mangrove roots and leaves. [18] In additional, they are highly opportunistic and were noticed to feed on animal remains as well. [18][19] They were also found to prefer Avicennia alba leaves to other Singapore mangrove plant species and had no preference for fresh or old leaves. [18]


Vid. 03. P. eumolpe feeding. (Video: Jinfa©) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vid. 04. P. eumolpe coming out of a mud pool and grooming itself before feeding. (Video: Jinfa©)

Stridulation


Other than visual methods, P. eumolpe is also known to communicate with sound by stridulation, especially during the night when their facial bands are not visible. Sound is produced by rubbing the tubercles (Fig. 4 & 5) on the dorsal side of their chelae together (Fig. 29). [12] Boon et al. grouped the sound made by the crabs into rasp train and rasp series. [12] A rasp train is produced when one claw (rasping claw) is moved up and down repeatedly against the other stationary claw, between positions A1 and A2 (Fig. 27). [12] The rasp series is made up of a pure stridulation followed by the integral tap element. [12] Pure stridulation is a result of the crab moving its rasping claw upwards to reach position C from B, while the integral tap element is produced by striking the tip of the rasping claw on the propodus of the stationary contralateral claw (Fig. 27). [12]

Perisesarma eumolpe stridulation.png
Fig. 29. Movement of chelae to produce sound (Illustration reproduced with permission from Boon et al, 2009)

Sound is detected by the Barth's organ. This is found at the walking legs, on the underside of the meral-ischial joint, where the centre is bulging outwards from the surrounding depressed region (Fig. 30). [12]

Perisesarma eumolpe barth's organ 1.png Perisesarma eumolpe barth's organ 2.png
Fig. 30. Barth's organ on the meral-ischial joint (Photo & Illustration: Jinfa©)

Unlike other animals where displays are usually performed before contact (to minimize wastage of energy), P. eumolpe was observed to display this stridulatory behaviour after contact, especially after intense fights. This is very unusual as displays are usually done beforehand. Chen (2014) also found that stridulations were displayed by the winners after the fights. Thus, this behaviour is most likely a victory display, exclusively used for asserting victory.[40]

Branchial Water Movement & Reticulated Setae


How do the crabs breathe when they are out of water? Water enters the branchial chamber by capillary action of the numnerous setae on the coxal joints of the walking legs. It then flows to the gills where gaseous exchange occurs before being pumped out. Most of the water that flows out would move across the pterygostomial region, which is covered with reticulated setae that traps it. [30] When on land, deoxygnated water that has passed through the gills can also be transported to the reticulated setae where it is aerated with oxygen before it is moved back to the branchial chamber. This gives the crab the ability to stay out of water for long periods. [11]

Perisesarma eumolpe water movement.png
Fig. 31. Water movement of P. eumolpe. (Photo: Jinfa©)>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vid. 05. P. eumolpe circulating water around its reticulated setae. (Video: Jinfa©)>

Reproduction


P. eumolpe males have been observed to initiate coutship by waving their claws to attract females. [31] During copulation, both crabs face their ventral sides to each other and have their abdomens extended so that the male is able to insert his gonopods into the female's paired vulvae to deliver his sperm (Fig. 14 & 16; Vid. 06). [31]



Vid. 06. Sesarma rectum mating. (Video: wishikawa1)

As a result of having to extend their abdomens to mate, it has been generalized that crabs can only mate after a female has recently moulted because the abdomen of the females are inflexible during inter-moults. [31] This might not necessarily be true for Sesarmidae as studies on some of the crabs in this taxon such as Amrases ricord have been been shown to mate during inter-moults. [31][32] This has has yet to be confirmed for P. eumolpe. However, the evidence of mate guarding by males might indicate that females only mate at certain stages in the moult cycle. [16]

After fertilisation, females keep the eggs in her abdomen (Fig. 15) before spawning during a high tide on full or new moon. [13] The eggs hatch out into planktonic larvae known as zoea (Fig. 31). These would then grow and moult into megalopa (Fig. 32), the final stage as a zooplankton, before they become visible miniature crabs. [27]

external image crab_zoea.gif>>>>>external image crab_megalops.gif
Fig. 32. Crab zoea illustration. (Permission pending from Davey©)>>>>Fig. 33. Crab megalopa illustration. (Permission pending from Davey©)>


Taxonomy


Taxonavigation

Animalia
  • Arthropoda
    • Crustacea
      • Malacostraca
        • Eumalacostraca
          • Eucarida
            • Decapoda
              • Pleocyemata
                • Brachyura
                  • Eubrachyura
                    • Thoracotremata
                      • Grapsoidea
                        • Sesarmidae
                          • Perisesarma
                            • P. eumolpe

>
Perisesarma eumolpe 06.png
Fig. 34. P. eumolpe hiding in a crevice. (Photo: Jinfa©)
Ranks (such as family, class, order, genus, etc.) have been omitted in the taxonavigation as they are misleading. For example, two organism with the same ranks might not have the same evolutionary history (age of origin) and thus should not be compared at that level.

Taxonomic History

It is important to know the different names (synonyms) used for P. eumolpe as research on any organism is published under its species name. Thus, one could miss out information by searching with just the accepted name, as the organism might have been filed under a different name. The following paragraphs describe how the name of P. eumolpe has changed over the years.

P. eumolpe was first described by De Man and placed in the taxon Searma (Perisesarma). [2] Subsequently in 1909, Rathbun substituted the name Chiromantes Gistel, 1848 for de Man's Perisesarma. [33] This resulted in Tesch revising Sesarma (Perisesarma) eumolpe as Sesarma (Chiromantes) eumolpe in 1917. [3] Thereafter, in 1967, Campbell revised Sesarma (Chiromantes) and designated Sesarma dussumieri H. Milne Edwards, 1853 as the type specimen for this group. [34]

Following in 1973, Holthuis proposed that Chiromantes Gistel, 1848 should be the replacement name for Pachysoma De Haan (1833). [35] This was because Rathbun designated Grapsus (Pachysoma) bidens De Haan, 1833, as the type species of Pachysoma incorrectly as De Haan did not originally include that species in Pachysoma. [35][36][37] Thus, Holthius designated Grapsus (Pachysoma) haematocheir De Haan, 1833 as the type specimen for Pachysoma De Haan, 1833. [35]

On the other hand, (Pachysoma) haematocheir De Haan, 1833 was also the designated type specimen of the subgenus Holometopus H. Milne Edwards,1853 at that time. Therefore Chiromantes Gistel, 1848 became a senior objective synonym of Holometopus H. Milne Edwards,1853. [35]

Thus, in 1973, Holthuis revised that Chiromantes Gistel, 1848, should be used for the taxon usually indicated as Holometopus, while the taxon usually indicated as Chiromantes should be known as Perisesarma De Man, 1895. He then proceeded to designate P. eumolpe as the type specimen for Perisesarma, not knowing that Sesarma dussumieri H. Milne Edwards, 1853 was already designated as the type specimen by Campbell in 1967. [34][35][38] Thus, the correct type specimen for Perisesarma is Sesarma dussumieri H. Milne Edwards, 1853. [38]

In 2001, Sesarmidae was elevated to the family level from a sub-family. Consequently, Perisesarma was elevated to the genus level. [39] The current taxa nested in Sesarmidae is still very messy and are being revised. [27]

For more information on how to identify P. eumolpe, refer to Description section.
Perisesarma eumolpe 23.png
Fig. 35. P. eumolpe hiding in a crevice (Photo: Jinfa & Christopher©)
Perisesarma eumolpe 25.png
.
Fig. 36. P. eumolpe tucked in a hole in a wood (Photo: J©)

Phylogenetics

A phylogenetic tree construction by Gillkin and Schubart gave different tree toplogies with different selection criteria, both of which had high bootstrap support values (Fig. 37). When the selection criteria was parsimony, P. eumolpe formed an outgroup to the other 3 species of Perisesarma. This would suggest that P. samawati, P. guttatum and P. bidens
were more closely related to one another than P. eumolpe is to them. On the other hand, when maximum likelihood was chosen as the selection criteria, P. eumolpe formed sister groups with the similarly coloured P. samawati. [4] This would suggest that P. eumolpe and P. samawati was more closely related to one another than to the other crabs.
p eumolpe bootstrap.pngp eumolpe kimura 2.png
Fig. 37. Phylogenetic relationships of four Indo-Pacific species of Perisesarma spp. based on 575 base pairs of mtDNA coding for the 16S rRNA. Maximum parsimony tree (left) and maximum likelihood (neighbour joining, Kimura 2-parameter distances) tree (right) with confidence values established after 2000 bootstrap replicates. (Figure reproduced with permission from Gillikin & Schubart, 2004)
A more interesting phylogenetic tree would be to consider the sympatric similiar looking P. indiarium in the analysis. However, GenBank does not have the sequences for me to construct the tree.


Acknowledgements

I would like to give my thanks to Dr. Todd for introducing this crab to me.

Ze Lin for going out to Mandai to catch some crabs with me.

Paul and Wei Kit for helping me get food for the crabs.

Benjamin for helping me get food for the crabs and releasing them.

Maosheng and Christopher for helping me in taking photographs and videos.

Dr. Naruse, Dr. Gillikin, Peiya, Simon and Ria for their photographs and figures.

Sufyan for helping me troubleshoot my flash animations when they don't work as planned.

Dr. Ng for helping me with Fig. 11.

All researchers who has generated the information for me to put on this page.

Perisesarma eumolpe 26.png
Fig. 38. P. eumolpe hiding under a plank (Photo: Jinfa & Maosheng©)


Comments


comments powered by Disqus

Links



Literature Cited

  1. Davie, P. & Fransen, C., 2012. Perisesarma eumolpe (De Man, 1895). Accessed through World Register of Marine Species on 25/10/2012.
  2. De Man, 1895. Bericht über die von herrn Schiffscapitän Storm zu Atjeh, an den westlichen Küsten von Malakka, Borneo und Celebes sowie in der Java-See gesammelten Decapoden und Stomatopoden (Part 2). Zoologische Jahrbücher. Abteilung für Systematik, Ökologie und Geographie der Tiere, 9: 208–213. (Online PDF on BioStor website)
  3. Tesch, J. J., 1917. Synopsis of the genera Sesarma, Metasesarma, Sarmatium and Clistocoeloma, with a key to the determination of the Indo-Pacific species. Zoologische Mededelingen, 3: 127–260. (Online PDF on Assembling the Tree of Life: Decapoda website)
  4. Gillikin, D. P. and Schubart, C. D., 2004. Ecology and systematics of mangrove crabs of the genus Perisesarma (Crustacea: Brachyura: Sesarmidae) from East Africa. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 141: 435–445.(Online abstract on Wiley Online Library website)
  5. Huang, H., P. A. Todd & D. C. J. Yeo, 2008. Inter- and intra-specific variation in the facial colours of Perisesarma eumolpe and Perisesarma indiarum (Crustacea: Brachyura: Sesarmidae). Hydrobiologia, 598: 361–371. (Online abstract on SpringerLink website)
  6. Huang, H., 2007. Facial colouration in Perisesarma eumolpe and P. indiarum and its function in con-specific signaling. Honours thesis submitted to the Department of Biological Sciences, The National University of Singapore.
  7. Wang, Y. W., 2008. Functions of the Face Colour Band in Two Species of Mangrove Crabs.Honours thesis submitted to the Department of Biological Sciences, The National University of Singapore.
  8. Todd, P. A., W. Y. Wang, H. Huang, C. C. Belle, M. L. M. Lim, D. C. J. Yeo, 2011. The function of colourful facial bands in mangrove crab (Perisesarma) communication. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 407(1): 26–33. (Online Abstract on ScienceDirect website)
  9. Ashton, E. C., 2002. Mangrove sesarmid crab feeding experiments in Peninsular Malaysia, Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 273(1): 97119. (Online abstract on ScienceDirect website)
  10. Lee, S. Y., 1997. Potential trophic importance of the faecal material of the mangrove crab Sesarma messa. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 159: 275–284.(Online PDF on the Inter-Resarch Science Center website)
  11. Ng, P. K. L. & N. Sivasothi (eds.), 1999. A Guide to the Mangroves of Singapore II: Animal Diversity. Singapore Science Centre, Singapore. 168 pp.
  12. Boon, P. Y., D. C. J. Yeo, & P. A. Todd, 2009. Sound production and reception in mangrove crabs Perisesarma spp. (Brachyura: Sesarmidae). Aquatic Biology, 5:107–116. (Online PDF on the Inter Research website)
  13. Flores, A. A. V., J. Saraiva & J. Paula, 2002. Sexual Maturity, Reproductive Cycles, and Juvenile Recruitment of Perisesarma guttatum (Brachyura, Sesarmidae) at Ponta Rasa Mangrove Swamp, Inhaca Island, Mozambique. Journal of Crustacean Biology , 22(1): 143156. (Online Abstract on JSTOR website)
  14. Tweedie, M. W. F., 1936. On the crabs of the family Grapsidae in the collection of the Raffles Museum. Bulletin of the Raffles Museum, 12: 4470. (Online PDF on Raffles Museum of Biodiversity Research website)
  15. Soh, H. S., 2011 The Functions of Crab Colours. Honours thesis submitted to the Department of Biological Sciences, The National University of Singapore.
  16. Boh, Z., 2010. Structurally-enhanced Brightness and Communication in Perisesarma eumolpe. Honours thesis submitted to the Department of Biological Sciences, The National University of Singapore.
  17. Wang, W. Y. & P. A. Todd, 2012. Evidence for carotenoid pigments in the facial bands of two mangrove crab species from Singapore. Nature in Singapore, 5: 159–164. (Online PDF on the Raffles Bulletin of Zoology website)
  18. Boon, P. Y., D. C. J. Yeo, & P. A. Todd, 2008. Feeding ecology of two species of Perisesarma (Crustacea: Decapoda: Brachyura: Sesarmidae) in Mandai Mangroves, Singapore. Journal of Crustacean Biology, 28(3): 480–484. (Online abstract on BioOne website)
  19. Diele, K. , D. M. Tran Ngoc, S. J. Geist, F. W. Meyer, Q. H. Pham, U. Saint-Paul, T. Tran, U. Berger, 2012. Impact of typhoon disturbance on the diversity of key ecosystem engineers in a monoculture mangrove forest plantation, Can Gio Biosphere Reserve, Vietnam. Global and Planetary Change, in press. (Online Abstract on ScienceDirect website)
  20. Ng, P. K. L., D. Guinot & P. J. F. Davie, 2008. Systema Brachyurorum: Part 1. An annotated checklist of extant Brachyuran crabs of the world. The Raffles Bulletin of Zoology, 17: 1–286. (Online PDF on the The Digital Academic Repository of Naturalis Biodiversity Center website)
  21. Tan, C. G. S. & P. K. L. Ng, 1994. An annotated checklist of mangrove brachyuran crabs from Malaysia and Singapore. Hydrobiologia, 285: 75–84. (Online abstract on SpringerLink website)
  22. Ng, P. K. L., 1998. Crabs. In: FAO Species Identification Guide for fishery purposes. The Living marine Resources of the Western Central Pacific. Volume 1. K. E. Carpenter & N. Volker (editors), Food and Agriculture Organisation, Rome. (Online PDF on the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations website)
  23. Aguiar, A. P., 2005. An accurate procedure to describe colors in taxonomic works, with an example from Ichneumonidae (Hymenoptera). Zootaxa, 1008: 3038. (Online abstract on Magnolia Press website)
  24. Carter, J. D., 2003. The effects of preservation and conservation treatments on the DNA of museum invertebrate fluid preserved collections. A thesis presented for the degree of master of philosophy. (Online PDF on the National Museum of Wales website)
  25. von Hagen, H. O., 1978. The systematic position of Sesarma (Sesarma) rectum Randall and a new definition of the subgenus Sesarma (Brachyura, Grapsidae). Crustaceana, 34: 45–54. (Online Abstract on JSTOR website)
  26. Abele, L. G., 1992. A review of the grapsid crab genus Sesarma (Crustacea: Decapoda: Grapsidae) in America, with the description of a new genus. Smithsonian Contribution to Zoology, 527: 1–60. (Online PDF on the Smithsonian Libraries website)
  27. Guerao, G., K. Anger, U. W. E. Nettelmann & C. D. Schubart, 2004. Complete larval and early juvenile development of the mangrove crab Perisesarma fasciatum (Crustacea: Brachyura: Sesarmidae) from Singapore, with a larval comparison of Parasesarma and Perisesarma. Journal of Plankton Research, 26: 1389–1408. (Online PDF on the Oxford Journals website)
  28. Parker, G. A., 1974. Assessment strategy and the evolution of fighting behaviour. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 47: 223–243. (Online abstract on ScienceDirect website)
  29. Lee, S. Y., 1998. Ecological role of grapsid crabs in mangrove ecosystems: a review. Marine and Freshwater Research, 49: 335–343. (Online abstract on CSIRO Publishing website)
  30. Felgenhauer, B. E. & L. G. Abele, 1983. Branchial Water Movement in the Grapsid Crab Sesarma reticulatum Say. Journal of Crustacean Biology, 3(2): 187-195. (Online Abstract on JSTOR website)
  31. Hartnoll, R. G., 1969. Mating in the Brachyura. Crustaceana, 16(2):161–181. (Online Abstract on JSTOR website)
  32. Warner, G. F., 1967. The life-history of the mangrove tree crab, Aratus pisoni. Journal of Zoology, 153: 321-335. (Online Abstract on Wiley Online Library website)
  33. Rathbun, M. J., 1909. New crabs fro the Gulf of Siam. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 22: 107–114. (Online PDF on the Biodiversity Heritage website)
  34. Campbell, B. M., 1967. The Australian Sesarminae (Crustacea: Brachyura). Five species of Sesarma (Chiromantes). Memoirs of the Queensland Museum, 15 (1): 1–19.
  35. Holthuis, L. B., 1977. The Grapsidae, Gecarcinidae and Palicidae (Crustacea: Decapoda: Brachyura) of the Red Sea. Israel Journal of Zoology, 26: 149–192. (Online PDF on the AToL Decapoda website)
  36. Rahayu, D. L., & Davie, P. J. (2002). Two new species and a new record of Perisesarma (Decapoda, Brachyura, Grapsidae, Sesarminae) from Indonesia. Crustaceana, 75(3-4), 597–607. (Online Abstract on ingentaconnect™ website)
  37. Rathbun, M. J., 1918. The grapsoid crabs of America. Bulletin - United States National Museum, 97: 1-461. (Online PDF on the AToL Decapoda website)
  38. Davie, P. J. F., 2002. Zoological Catalogue of Australia. Volume 19. CSIRO Publishing. 564 pp. (Online Preview on Google Books)
  39. Martin, J. W. & G. E. Davis, 2001. An updated classification of the recent Crustacea. Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County Science Series, 39: 1–124.
    (Online PDF on the Flanders Marine Institute website)
  40. Chen, P. Z., Carrasco, L. R., Ng, P. K. L., 2014. Post-Contest Stridulation Used Exclusively as a Victory Display in Mangrove Crabs. Ethology, 120: 532–539.
    (Online Abstract on Wiley Online Library website)

16. Results from reflectance spectrometry show the differences in the intensity of reflected light measured from -60° to 60°, at 5° intervals (with down-welling light arriving from 0° to 60°, as depicted by the crab icons at the top of the graph). The facial bands collected and reflected most light towards the 0° to 10° sector (highlighted in the coloured strips).